2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 694 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XJ | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 55 L |