2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1997 Acura CL
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura CL would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP) has 245 more horse power than 1997 Acura CL. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 155 kg more than 1997 Acura CL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XJ | 1997 Acura CL | |
Make | Jaguar | Acura |
Model | XJ | CL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 145 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 84 L | 65 L |