2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 1997 Acura SLX
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura SLX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura SLX would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP) has 200 more horse power than 1997 Acura SLX. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura SLX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 160 kg more than 1997 Acura SLX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura SLX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XJ | 1997 Acura SLX | |
Make | Jaguar | Acura |
Model | XJ | SLX |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2761 mm |