2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 2002 MCC Smart

To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Smart would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 950 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Jaguar XJ 2002 MCC Smart
Make Jaguar MCC
Model XJ Smart
Year Released 2005 2002
Body Type Sedan Convertible
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 4195 cc 698 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 294 HP 80 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 411 Nm 110 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 66.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 67 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1740 kg 790 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 3430 mm
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1200 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2370 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 35 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]