2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 3,555 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (254 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (335 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XJ | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XJ | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3555 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 254 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 335 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3170 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 110 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 61 L |