2005 Jaguar XJ vs. 2012 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2012 Toyota Aygo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 2012 Toyota Aygo. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2012 Toyota Aygo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 876 kg more than 2012 Toyota Aygo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Aygo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Aygo. (93 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Aygo. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2012 Toyota Aygo has manual transmission. 2012 Toyota Aygo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XJ | 2012 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | XJ | Aygo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 93 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 4.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 4.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 35 L |