2005 Jaguar XJR vs. 1980 Renault 20
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJR is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 20 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 520 kg more than 1980 Renault 20.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1980 Renault 20 has manual transmission. 1980 Renault 20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XJR | 1980 Renault 20 | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XJR | 20 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1647 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1708 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2670 mm |