2005 Jaguar XJR vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Clio would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1999 Renault Clio. (106 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 713 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJR (554 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Clio. (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Clio. 2005 Jaguar XJR has automatic transmission and 1999 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1999 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XJR | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XJR | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 554 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.3 mm | 80.5 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.3 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1708 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 50 L |