2005 Jaguar XK vs. 1964 MG MGC
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG MGC would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1964 MG MGC. (149 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1964 MG MGC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (553 Nm) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG MGC. (174 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 1964 MG MGC | |
Make | Jaguar | MG |
Model | XK | MGC |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 553 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |