2005 Jaguar XK vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1054 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Jaguar | Lotus |
Model | XK | Elan |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1714 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |