2005 Jaguar XK vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 793 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (553 Nm) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | XK | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 553 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1753 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2480 mm |