2005 Jaguar XK vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 273 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
Model | XK | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1753 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2760 mm |