2005 Jaguar XK vs. 1999 Opel Omega

To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1999 Opel Omega. (134 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1999 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 123 kg more than 1999 Opel Omega. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (553 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Opel Omega. (185 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Opel Omega.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Jaguar XK 1999 Opel Omega
Make Jaguar Opel
Model XK Omega
Year Released 2005 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4196 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 390 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 553 Nm 185 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1753 kg 1630 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2590 mm 2740 mm