2005 Jaguar XK vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar XK | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | XK | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 98.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2380 mm |
