2005 Jaguar XK vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2005 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | XK | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 411 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2380 mm |