2005 Jaguar XK vs. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Isuzu D-MAX would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. (129 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 95 kg more than 2005 Jaguar XK.
Because 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (553 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX. (300 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Isuzu D-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 2003 Isuzu D-MAX | |
Make | Jaguar | Isuzu |
Model | XK | D-MAX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 553 Nm | 300 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1753 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 3060 mm |