2005 Jaguar XK vs. 2004 Lincoln Mark X
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Lincoln Mark X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Lincoln Mark X would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2004 Lincoln Mark X. (280 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2004 Lincoln Mark X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln Mark X weights approximately 172 kg more than 2005 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (553 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Lincoln Mark X. (388 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Lincoln Mark X.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 2004 Lincoln Mark X | |
Make | Jaguar | Lincoln |
Model | XK | Mark X |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 3900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 553 Nm | 388 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1753 kg | 1925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2770 mm |