2005 Jaguar XK vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jaguar XK. (411 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 2006 Nissan M | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | XK | M |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 294 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 411 Nm | 462 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |