2005 Jaguar XK vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 2007 Renault Clio. (197 HP @ 7250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Clio.
Because 2005 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Renault Clio. (292 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jaguar | Renault |
Model | XK | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 292 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |