2005 Jaguar XK vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer. (134 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 319 kg more than 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer. (176 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Jaguar XK 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Jaguar Mitsubishi
Model XK Lancer
Year Released 2005 2008
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4195 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 294 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 6150 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 411 Nm 176 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1714 kg 1395 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1290 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2590 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.2 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]