2005 Jaguar XK vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC90. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 402 kg more than 2005 Jaguar XK.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (553 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo XC90. (420 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jaguar XK | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
Model | XK | XC90 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4196 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 553 Nm | 420 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1753 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 80 L |