2005 Jaguar XK vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar XK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 519 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2005 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Roadster, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar XK | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mini |
| Model | XK | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 294 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 411 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1714 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3728 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1384 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |
