2005 Jaguar XKR vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XKR is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,193 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XKR (391 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 373 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XKR weights approximately 1235 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XKR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 493 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar XKR | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XKR | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 4193 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 391 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2060 mm |
