2005 Jaguar XKR vs. 1999 Suzuki C2
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XKR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Suzuki C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Suzuki C2 would be higher. At 4,193 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XKR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XKR (391 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1999 Suzuki C2. (251 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XKR should accelerate faster than 1999 Suzuki C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XKR weights approximately 883 kg more than 1999 Suzuki C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XKR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Suzuki C2. (284 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Jaguar XKR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Suzuki C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jaguar XKR | 1999 Suzuki C2 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Suzuki |
| Model | XKR | C2 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4193 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 391 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 525 Nm | 284 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1735 kg | 852 kg |
