2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. (142 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
| Make | Jeep | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Cherokee | 220 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2195 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 78 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 72.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 48 L |
