2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 727 kg more than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1959 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Jeep | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Cherokee | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 104.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 91.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 2591 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 104 L |
