2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 2,774 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus 25 (196 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus 25 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1408 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1963 Lotus 25 has manual transmission. 1963 Lotus 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
Make | Jeep | Lotus |
Model | Cherokee | 25 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2774 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 9500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 456 kg |