2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1963 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 969 kg more than 1963 TVR Griffith.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 TVR Griffith. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1963 TVR Griffith | |
| Make | Jeep | TVR |
| Model | Cherokee | Griffith |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4727 cc |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1834 kg | 865 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2170 mm |
