2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1968 ZAZ 966. (38 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1968 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1968 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 ZAZ 966. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (72 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Jeep | ZAZ |
| Model | Cherokee | 966 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1196 cc |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 72 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1834 kg | 774 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2170 mm |
