2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1972 Matra-Simca M530
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Matra-Simca M530. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Matra-Simca M530 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1972 Matra-Simca M530. (71 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1972 Matra-Simca M530. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 929 kg more than 1972 Matra-Simca M530. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Matra-Simca M530. (128 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Matra-Simca M530. 2005 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1972 Matra-Simca M530 has manual transmission. 1972 Matra-Simca M530 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1972 Matra-Simca M530 | |
| Make | Jeep | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Cherokee | M530 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 935 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2570 mm |
