2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1976 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-4. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 757 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1976 Mazda RX-4 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | Cherokee | RX-4 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2616 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1867 kg | 1110 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2520 mm |