2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1976 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1471 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1976 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
| Model | Cherokee | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 42 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 30 L |
