2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1977 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 280Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 280Z would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 150 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 667 kg more than 1977 Datsun 280Z.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Datsun 280Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Datsun 280Z. (221 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Datsun 280Z. 2005 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1977 Datsun 280Z has manual transmission. 1977 Datsun 280Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1977 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | Jeep | Datsun |
Model | Cherokee | 280Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2753 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1867 kg | 1200 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |