2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1981 Volvo 265
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Volvo 265 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 445 kg more than 1981 Volvo 265.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 265. (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 265.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1981 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Jeep | Volvo |
| Model | Cherokee | 265 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2849 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 73 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1867 kg | 1422 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
