2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 999 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. 2005 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1982 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1982 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Cherokee | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 865 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2420 mm |
