2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1983 Lancia Delta
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Lancia Delta (250 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Lancia Delta should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 534 kg more than 1983 Lancia Delta.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lancia Delta. (290 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lancia Delta.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1983 Lancia Delta | |
| Make | Jeep | Lancia |
| Model | Cherokee | Delta |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1759 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 88.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 71.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 7.6:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1834 kg | 1300 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 59 L |
