2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1984 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Mazda Cosmo (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 629 kg more than 1984 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mazda Cosmo. (201 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1984 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Cherokee | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 201 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 1235 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2620 mm |
