2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1986 Holden Camira
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Holden Camira would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1986 Holden Camira. (83 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1986 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 852 kg more than 1986 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Holden Camira. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Holden Camira. (126 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Holden Camira.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1986 Holden Camira | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Cherokee | Camira |
Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1867 kg | 1015 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2580 mm |