2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 772 kg more than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
| Make | Jeep | Maserati |
| Model | Cherokee | Bi Turbo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2491 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 305 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1867 kg | 1095 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2510 mm |
