2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1989 Holden Gemini
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Holden Gemini. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Holden Gemini would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1989 Holden Gemini. (72 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1007 kg more than 1989 Holden Gemini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Holden Gemini. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Gemini. (117 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1989 Holden Gemini | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Cherokee | Gemini |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1471 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 117 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1867 kg | 860 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2410 mm |