2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1989 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,690 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 ZIL 4104 (312 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (207 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 ZIL 4104 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 ZIL 4104. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 ZIL 4104 (607 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 1989 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1989 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Jeep | ZIL |
| Model | Cherokee | 4104 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 7690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 312 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 607 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 108 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90.8 mm | 104.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 199 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 6350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3890 mm |
