2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (207 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Acura TL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Jeep | Acura |
Model | Cherokee | TL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 207 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2840 mm |