2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1998 Holden Nova
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Holden Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Holden Nova would be higher. At 2,774 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1998 Holden Nova. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1998 Holden Nova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 799 kg more than 1998 Holden Nova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Holden Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Holden Nova. (135 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Holden Nova.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1998 Holden Nova | |
Make | Jeep | Holden |
Model | Cherokee | Nova |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2774 cc | 1587 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2470 mm |