2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 121 kg more than 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cherokee | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
