2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1999 Nissan SUT
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan SUT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan SUT would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1999 Nissan SUT. (140 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan SUT.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan SUT (372 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan SUT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1999 Nissan SUT | |
| Make | Jeep | Nissan |
| Model | Cherokee | SUT |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 3299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 207 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 372 Nm |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
