2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Matra-Simca M72 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (150 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
| Make | Jeep | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Cherokee | M72 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
