2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1157 kg more than 2003 Mitsubishi Minica.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2003 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 2003 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2003 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cherokee | Minica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 656 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1867 kg | 710 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2350 mm |