2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 410 kg more than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Cherokee. (360 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Cherokee | Armada |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2774 cc | 5556 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 147 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 2274 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 106 L |