2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2004 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Samsung SM3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Samsung SM3 would be higher. At 3,700 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (150 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2004 Samsung SM3. (94 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2004 Samsung SM3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 707 kg more than 2004 Samsung SM3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Samsung SM3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2004 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Jeep | Samsung |
Model | Cherokee | SM3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1867 kg | 1160 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2540 mm |