2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 850 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (120 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler. 2005 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 2008 Mazda Rustler has manual transmission. 2008 Mazda Rustler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Cherokee | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
| Make | Jeep | Mazda |
| Model | Cherokee | Rustler |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1586 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 147 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1864 kg | 1014 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 54 L |
